Lisa Denny: Workforce Demographer
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Publications, Presentations and Media
  • Contract Research

our economy: don't count the chickens before they hatch

10/3/2014

0 Comments

 
Last week at the CEDA Economic and Political Outlook for Tasmania Ivan Colhoun, Chief Economist at the ANZ Bank, suggested that the unemployment rate is the cheat's guide to providing an indicator of economic performance.  Given slight improvements in Tasmania's unemployment rate in recent months I thought I would revisit an article I wrote in October 2011 for tasmanianjobs.com at a time when there were also "encouraging signs that our economy is on the road to recovery".  My article concluded then that the unemployment rate and the labour force participation rate demonstrated the potential for a downward spiral to continue.  My recommendations then was that we were at a point in time in the economy that we needed stability and direction to enable an increase in confidence (see the October 2011 article here).

So, this morning I have updated the data from that article, and unfortunately I was right - the downward spiral of increasing unemployment rates and decreasing labour force participation rates continued.  See the below chart.
Picture
I recap how to interpret this chart.  The gap between the two lines can be interpreted to represent the strength and confidence in the economy at a point in time.  The greater the distance in the gap between the two lines, the stronger the economy as more people are confident of participating in the labour market and less people are unemployed.  When the lines move together in an upward trajectory, labour force participation and unemployment are both increasing, indicating that there is confidence in gaining employment but there is a short time lapse between entering the labour market and securing employment (Point A). This pattern tends to be a very short lived one as employment catches up to supply.  When the lines move in different directions and the labour force participation rate is increasing and unemployment decreasing (Point B) it indicates that the supply of labour (new entrants to the labour market) can not keep up with the demand for labour.  Conversely, when the labour force participation rate is decreasing and the unemployment rate is increasing (Point C), there is a lack of confidence, people are losing their jobs and joining the unemployed status.  This may result in the unemployed eventually becoming despondent and exiting the labour market all together.  This occurs when both lines move in a downward trajectory (Point D) - that is labour force participation and unemployment are both decreasing.  This could be for a number of reasons; either a lack of confidence and growing despondency in the ability to gain employment or a factor of the age of our population. 

So, where is Tasmania now? We are currently just past Point D, experiencing a stablisation of both the labour force participation rate and the unemployment rate - but both are yet to make an upward movement (as in Point A) - the sign of momentum in a recovering economy.  We are in much the same place as we were in October 2011, however the economy didn't recover then as it was anticipated to do. 

My advice remains the same as it was then - a need for stability and direction to build confidence.  Don't take the foot off the pedal and don't count the chickens before they hatch. 
0 Comments

more important issues than the difference between net/gross public services job losses

5/3/2014

0 Comments

 

There appears much consternation with regard to proposed public service job cuts under the Tasmanian Liberals plan for Tasmania, with debate focussed on the difference between net and gross proposed job losses.  The Liberals claim that the net loss will be 500 jobs in their first four year term.  Calculations by the media determine the gross figure to be around 858 job losses when you add in the increase in the number of teachers, nurses and police announced by the Liberals during their election campaign.

The Liberals assert a budget saving of around $150 million as a result of the retraction in the size of the public service and that no forced sackings will be made.  The Liberals suggest that these cuts will be achieved from retirement, natural attrition and some voluntary redundancies.

I suggest there are more important issues to consider.  

As at the time of the latest ABS Census of Population and Housing (August 2011) the average age of the state public servant was 44.3 years.  See the below chart for a visual representation of Tasmania's state government employee age structure.  

Based on the Census 2011 data, between now and 2018, approximately 11,591 public servants will have reached the age at which they are eligible to access their private superannuation savings (56 years of age from 2017). This is 37 per cent of the 2011 public service workforce.  Many of these will have unfunded, defined benefits scheme entitlements.  

Even if those who are eligible to retire have not done so by 2018, based on Census 2011 data, there will be 6,117 public servants aged 55 to 60 years and 5,242 public servants ages 
60 to 65 years old, all of whom are likely to be considering retirement in the imminent future.  Furthermore, for those who do not have sufficient private superannuation savings and need to wait until eligible for the age pension (age 65.5 in 2018) there will be 3,950 public servants aged at least 65 years in 2018.

Picture
Based on this data, it is not going to be difficult to reduce the public service by a net 500 (or gross 858) by 2018.  
The issues that require the greatest consideration by all political parties is not about the number of net or gross job losses into the future, but the fact that in the next term of office over a third of Tasmanian state government employees will reach the age at which they are eligible to retire. The questions we should be asking are:

1) how are we going to replace this significant loss of labour
2) how are we going to fund the associated superannuation entitlements

Any future government should be focusing on maximising attachment to the labour force, increasing productivity, increasing efficiencies and maintaining key personnel in key positions.  I won't even mention the risk that voluntary redundancies place on the loss of productive/effective employees (who are often confident they can gain employment elsewhere). Nor will I mention the restrictions that the State Service Act places on ensuring that government can deliver its services efficiently and effectively.  

The focus of the future government should be on how to restructure the state service in the face of a double whammy - an ageing population and ageing public service workforce - to ensure delivery of basic services and infrastructure and ensure appropriate revenue streams through maintaining the population and growing the economy.  


0 Comments

    Archives

    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    October 2016
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012

    Categories

    All
    Births
    Confidence
    Deaths
    Demography
    Economic Growth
    Economic Performance
    Economics
    Education
    Employment
    Gen Y
    Labour Force
    Leadership
    Migration
    Population
    Population Ageing
    Population Growth
    Pride
    Productivity
    Tasmania
    Total Social Production
    Vital Index
    Youth
    Youth Unemployment

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.